Human Rights and Digital Choice: Rethinking the Right (Not) to Use the Internet
Abstract
As digitalization permeates nearly all areas of life, access to the internet has become essential for the exercise of numerous human rights, including freedom of expression, access to information, and participation in public life. However, the growing expectation to engage digitally may undermine individual autonomy, especially when access to fundamental services or legal entitlements depends on being online. This article examines the underexplored concept of the right not to use the internet as a human rights issue. It argues that digital non-use – whether by choice, necessity, or circumstance – must be recognized as an aspect of informational self-determination rooted in the principles of dignity and autonomy. While access to the internet facilitates other rights, the freedom to disconnect is equally essential to prevent new forms of exclusion, coercion, and surveillance. Drawing on evolving interpretations of existing rights – particularly the rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and non-discrimination – the paper proposes that digital autonomy requires protecting both positive and negative dimensions: the right to use the internet and the right not to use it. It hypothesizes that formally recognizing a ‘right to digital non-use’ as a separate human right faces significant challenges in highly digitalized societies, while the existing European human rights framework is sufficiently robust to protect this right. The analysis supports both hypotheses.References
Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. (2023). Resolution 2510. Closing the digital divide: Promoting equal access to digital technologies. https://pace.coe.int/en/files/33001/html
Custers, B. (2019). Nieuwe digitale (grond)rechten. Nederlands Juristenblad, 44, 3288–3295. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4014541
Decision of the Constitutional Council of France of 10 June 2009, case no. 2009–580 DC.
Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of France of 3 June 2022, case no. 452798.
De Hert, P., & Kloza, D. (2012). Internet (access) as a new fundamental right: Inflating the current rights framework? European Journal of Law and Technology, 3(3). https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/123
European Commission. (2024). State of the digital decade 2024 (Report to the European Parliament and Council). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=COM:2024:260:FIN
Faith, B., & Hernandez, K. (2024). Smartphone – and tablet-reliant internet users: Affordances and digital exclusion. Media and Communication, 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8173
Frosini, T. E. (2014). The internet access as a fundamental right. Studia Prawnicze, 1(14), 5–12.
Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L., & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing digital exclusion: Technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 1–8.
Inter-American Development Bank. (2020, 29 October). At least 77 million rural inhabitants have no access to high-quality internet services. https://www.iadb.org/en/news/least-77-million-rural-inhabitants-have-no
access-high-quality-internet-services
International IDEA. (2023). Rights in the digital age. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/html/rights-digital-age
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 30 June 1993 on the case of James v. United Kingdom, application no. 8793/79.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 30 June 1993 on the case of Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland, application no. 16130/90.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 29 April 2002 on the case of Pretty v. United Kingdom, application no. 2346/02.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 4 December 2008 on the case of S. and Marper v. United Kingdom, application nos. 30562/04 & 30566/04.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 September 2009 on the case of Manole and Others v. Moldova, application no. 13936/02.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 18 December 2012 on the case of Ahmet Yıldırım v. Turkey, application no. 3111/10.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 January 2016 on the case of Kalda v. Estonia, application no. 17429/10.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 September 2019 on the case of Vučina v. Croatia, application no. 58955/13.
Karaboga, M., Matzner, T., Obersteller, H., & Ochs, C. (2017). Is there a right to offline alternatives in a digital world? In: Leenes, R., van Brakel, R., Gutwirth, S., De Hert, P. (eds) Data Protection and Privacy: (In)visibilities and Infrastructures. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–50796-5_2,pp. 31–50).
Kaun, A. (2021). Ways of seeing digital disconnection: A negative sociology of digital culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27(6), 1571–1583. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211045535
Kaur, H. (2021). Protecting internet access: A human rights treaty approach. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 46(2), 767–806.
Kloza, D. (2024). The right not to use the internet. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105907.
Kloza, D., Kużelewska, E., Lievens, E., & Verdoodt, V. (Eds.). (2025). The right not to use the internet: Concept, Contexts, Consequences. Routledge.
Koops, B.-J., Newell, B. C., Timan, T., Škorvánek, I., Chokrevski, T., & Galič, M. (2017). A typology of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 38(2), 483–575.
Kużelewska, E., Tomaszuk, M., & Malinowski, D. (2025). The elderly digital divide: Digital exclusion versus the right not to use the internet. International Journal for Semiotics of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196–025-10334–4
Lucchi, N. (2013). The role of internet access in enabling individual’s rights and freedoms. European University Institute – RSCAS working paper, 47,1–22.
Międzynarodowy Związek Telekomunikacyjny. (2024, 10 November). Fakty i liczby 2024 – Użycie internetu. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2024/11/10/ff24-internet-use/
Mikołajczyk, B. (2023). Universal human rights instruments and digital literacy of older persons. The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(3), 403–424.
Miranda Boto, J. M., & Brameshuber, E. (2024). The digitalisation of tools for workers’ representation in Europe and Spain: A first approach. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 29(2), 209–222.
Mubarak, F., & Suomi, R. (2022). Elderly forgotten? Digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide. The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 59, 1–7.
O’Sullivan, D. (2025, 23 March). ‘It’s political’: Why some people refuse to have a smartphone. SwissInfo. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/digital-democracy/its-political-why-some-people-refuse-to-have-a-smartphone/89012366
O’Sullivan, D. (2025, 3 April). How Swiss federalism is helping the rise of a new digital right. SwissInfo. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/digital-democracy/how-swiss-federalism-is-helping-the-rise-of-a-new-digital-right/89023201
Passaglia, P. (2022). Behind the curtain: Questioning the right to access the internet. In search of definitions (and conditions). Völkerrechtsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20221017–110251-0
Passaglia, P. (2025). An attempt to conceptualise the right to access the internet and its impact on the right not to use it. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet: Concept, Contexts, Consequences (pp. 29–43). Routledge.
Pollicino, O. (2020). The right to internet access: Quid Iuris? In von Arnauld A., von der Decken K., Susi M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of new human rights (pp. 263–275). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676106.021
Reglitz, M. (2020). The human right to free internet access. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37(2), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12395
Reglitz, M. (2023). The socio-economic argument for the human right to internet access. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 22(4), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X231167597
Reglitz, M. (2024). Free internet access as a human right. Cambridge University Press.
Right to Offline Coalition. (2024). Essential services must be accessible, even offline: The open letter. https://righttooffline.eu/?lang=en
Rossi, J. (2025). Is there a right to be offline “for no reason” in France?. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet: Concept, Contexts, Consequences (pp. 76–91). Routledge.
Shandler, R., & Canetti, D. (2019). A reality of vulnerability and dependence: Internet access as a human right. Israel Law Review, 52(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223718000262
Susi, M. (2025). Framing the right not to use the internet. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet: Concept, Contexts, Consequences (pp. 44–63). Routledge.
Terzis, G. (2025). Ethical meditations for a human right to an analogue life. In D. Kloza, E. Kużelewska, E. Lievens, & V. Verdoodt (Eds.), The right not to use the internet: Concept, Contexts, Consequences (pp. 7–28). Routledge.
Tomalty, J. (2017). Is there a human right to internet access? Philosophy Now, 118, 8–11. https://philosophynow.org/issues/118/Is_There_A_Human_Right_To_Internet_Access
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Warren, S., & Brandeis, L. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.
Whitman, J. Q. (2004). The two western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. Yale Law Journal, 113(6), 1151–1221.
Wiśniewski, A. (2021). The European Court of Human Rights and internet-related cases. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 26(3), 109–133.
World Bank Group. (2023, 27 June). From connectivity to services: Digital transformation in Africa. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2023/06/27/from-connectivity-to-services-digital-transformation-in-africa
