The Renaissance of the Right to Strike in the United States Inside and Outside of Traditional Labour Law
Ключевые слова:
strike, unions, artificial intelligence, collective bargaining, human rights, antitrust, independent contractorsАннотация
The epithets on the grave of the American labour movement have long been written. Yet hope springs eternal. Recent developments, such as the Covid pandemic and the role of artificial intelligence in disrupting traditional work models, have prompted suggestions that labour unions may yet become reinvigorated and have a role in safeguarding worker rights in the face of these changes. This article examines these prospects, particularly through the lens of the strike and other forms of collective action. While traditional union activity – notwithstanding raised hopes – remains hamstrung by regressive US labour law and low prospects for legislative change, collective action in the wider sense does have potential to boost worker rights. Such action includes both lawful and unlawful strikes and protests in key sectors, by union and non-union employees, and even non-employees, such as independent contractors. The subject of these actions may even go beyond traditional employment concerns and include human rights. Potential obstacles under traditional labour law and antitrust law are not insurmountable.
Библиографические ссылки
Beydoun, K. (2025). Playing politics: Social media, censorship, and speech gamification. Emory L. J., 75, 59–134.
Bhattarai, A. (2022, 26 May). Davos elite reassess globalization amid turmoil of pandemic and war. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/05/26/davos-globalization-covid-war/
Bresee, A. (2024). The consumer’s choice to boycott. Seattle U. L. Rev., 48, 185–202.
California Legislature. (2025). Transportation Network Company Drivers Labor Relations Act, AB 1340.
Catanzaro, Z. (2023). Beyond incentives: Copyright in the age of algorithmic production. N. Y. U. J. of Intell. Prop. & Ent. Law, 13, 1–55.
Chhoy, M., & Pearce, M. G. (2024). Worker outbursts, workplace rules and a resurgence of worker voice.
Geo. J. Poverty Law & Policy, 31, 355–392.
Cholden-Brown, L. (2022). Unionizing in the chambers of government. Rich. Pub. Int. L. Rev., 25, 101–129.
Coyle, J. (2023, 27 September). In Hollywood writers’ battle against AI, humans win (for now). AP News. https://apnews.com/article/hollywood-ai-strike-wga-artificial-intelligence39ab-72582c3a15f77510c9c30a45ffc8
Curren, A. (2023). Digital replicas: Harm caused by actors’ digital twins and hope provided by the right of publicity. Tex. L. Rev., 102, 155–183.
Davies, R. (2005). Strike season: Protecting labor–management conflict in the age of terror. Geo. L. J., 93, 1783–1833.
Delfino, M., & Szymanski, C. (2024). Platform work and trade union participation: European and American perspectives. Italian Law Journal, 10(1–2), 73–97.
Duff, M. (2014). Alt-labor, secondary boycotts, and toward a labor organization bargain. Cath. U. L. Rev., 63, 837–877.
Fitzgerald, L. (2025, 23 December). California gig drivers gear up for union rights in 2026. Jefferson Public Radio.
Florida. (1968). Constitution.
Frankford, D. (2022). How COVID-19 has infected the totality of life (including law). Rutgers U. L. Rev., 74, 973–1035.
Garver, R. (2022, 22 December). Biden signs bill averting strike, to rail unions’ dismay. Voice of America.
https://www.voanews.com/a/biden-signs-bill-to-block-us-railroad-strike-/6860131.html
Gott, A. (2025, 8 October). Can states grant federal antitrust immunity? Part 1: Why California’s new gigdriver law won’t survive Parker. The Antitrust Attorney Blog. https://www.theantitrustattorney.com/can-states-grant-federal-antitrust-immunity-part-1-why-californias-new-gig-driver-lawwont-survive-parker/
Gott, A. (2025, 20 October). Can states grant federal antitrust immunity? Part 2: The Sherman Act vs. Sacramento: Why AB 1340 is preempted by federal law. The Antitrust Attorney Blog. https://www.theantitrustattorney.com/can-states-grant-federal-antitrust-immunity-part-2-the-shermanact-vs-sacramento-why-ab-1340-is-preempted-by-federal-law/
Hawaii. (1978). Constitution.
Hull, S. (2023). Work disguised as leisure, leisure disguised as work: The roots and consequences of the bifurcated economy. Yale J. L. & Human., 34, 303–363.
Huq, C. (2025). Muslim American workers, faith and labor organizing. St. Louis L. J., 69, 299–330.
Jacobs, J. (2024, 22 July). The rebirth of American manufacturing: Growth and innovation. BlackRock. https://www.blackrock.com/us/financial-professionals/insights/exploring-us-manufacturing
Judgment of the California Court of Appeals of 1970 on the case of Trustees of Cal. State Colleges v. Local 1352, S.F. State etc. Teachers, 13 Cal. App. 3d 863, 867 (1970).
Judgment of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court of 2009 on the case of Marion Ctr. Area Sch. Dist. v. Marion Ctr. Area Educ. Ass’n, 982 A.2d 1041 (Pa. Cmwth. 2009).
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona of 1987 on the case of Arizona Farmworkers Union v. Whitewing Ranch Management, 154 Ariz. 525, 532 (1987).
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Hawaii of 2002 on the case of United Pub. Workers, AFSME, Local 646 v. Yogi, 101 Haw. 46 (2002).
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Kentucky of 1970 on the case of Jefferson County Teachers Asso. v. Board of Education, 463 S.W.2d 627, 630 (Ky. 1970).
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Missouri of 2012 on the case of E. Mo. Coalition of Police v. City of Chesterfield, 386 S.W.3d 755 (Mo. 2012).
Judgment of the Supreme Court of New Jersey of 2009 on the case of Lourdes Medical Center of Burlington County v. Board of Review, 197 N.J. 339, 364 n. 15 (2009).
Judgment of the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit of 2020 on the case of BNSF Ry. Co. v. Int’l Ass’n of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transp. Workers – Transp. Div., 973 F.3d 326, 334–335 (5th Cir. 2020).
Judgment of the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit of 1989 on the case of Roseville Dodge, Inc. v. NLRB, 882 F.2d 1355, 1359 (8th Cir. 1989).
Judgment of the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit of 2025 on the case of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. NLRB, 158 F.4th 910 (8th Cir. 2025).
Judgment of the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit of 2018 on the case of Chamber of Com. of the US v. City of Seattle, 890 F.3d 769 (9th Cir. 2018).
Judgment of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit of 2015 on the case of Spurlino Materials, LLC v. NLRB, 805 F.3d 1131, 1140 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
Judgment of the US District Court for the Central District of California of 2020 on the case of William Morris Endeavor Entm’t, LLC v. Writers Guild of Am., West, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247744,*14–15 (C.D.Ca. 2020).
Judgment of the US District Court for the District of Columbia of 1971 on the case of United Federation of Postal Clerks v. Blount, 325 F. Supp. 879 (D.D.C. 1971).
Judgment of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois of 2024 on the case of Belt Ry. Co. of Chi. v. Int’l Ass’n of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, & Transp. Workers, Transp. Div., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53681, *16–17 (N.D. Ill. 2024).
Judgment of the US Supreme Court of 1938 on the case of NLRB v. Mackay Radio and Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938).
Judgment of the US Supreme Court of 1962 on the case of NLRB v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9 (1962).
Judgment of the US Supreme Court of 1970 on the case of Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerk’s Union, 398 U.S. 235 (1970).
Judgment of the US Supreme Court of 1976 on the case of Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of America, 428 US 397, 407 (1976).
Judgment of the US Supreme Court of 1979 on the case of Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, 441 U.S. 463, 465 (1979).
Judgment of the US Supreme Court of 1982 on the case of Longshoremen’s Association v. Allied International, 456 US 212, 226 (1982).
Judgment of the US Supreme Court of 2023 on the case of Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters Loc. Union no. 174, 598 U.S. 771 (2023).
Kinder, M. (2024, 12 April). Hollywood writers went on strike to protect their livelihoods from generative AI. Their remarkable victory matters for all workers. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/hollywood-writers-went-on-strike-to-protect-their-livelihoods-from-generative-ai-theirremarkable-victory-matters-for-all-workers/
LeClercq, D. (2024). Labor strife and peace. U. C. Irvine L. Rev., 15, 216–271.
LeRoy, M. (1995). Employer treatment of permanently replaced strikers, 1935–1991: Public policy implications. Yale L. & Pol’y Rev., 13, 1–43.
Missouri. (1945). Constitution.
Moberly, M. (2001). Striking a happy medium: The conversion of unfair labor practice strikes to economic strikes. Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L., 22, 131–173.
Morrison, S. (2024). What’s the deal with residuals? Los Angeles Lawyer, 47, 32–48.
New Jersey. (1947). Constitution.
New York. (2001). Constitution.
Nicholas, P. (2023, 26 September). Biden makes history by joining striking autoworkers on the picket line. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-makes-history-striking-auto-workers-picket-line-rcna117348
Patten, D. (2023, 12 November). Read full SAG-AFTRA deal summary released ahead of ratification vote; Analysis of AI & streaming fund. Deadline. https://deadline.com/2023/11/sag-aftra-deal-summary-released-read-it-1235600852/
Perdue, A. (2023). Caregiver accommodation. Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L., 44, 207–280.
Press, E. (2024, 18 April). Biden is the most pro-labor president since F. D. R. Will it matter in November? The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/biden-is-the-most-pro-labor-president-since-fdr-will-it-matter-in-november
Ramahi, Z. (2019). Secondary boycotts in American labour law and the First Amendment: An application to the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement. Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L., 40, 151–167.
Reddy, D. (2021). ‘There is no such thing as an illegal strike’: Reconceptualizing the strike in law and political economy. Yale L. J. F., 130, 421–459.
Reiter, H. (2023). Editor in Chief ’s page. Energy L. J., 44(2), 1–22.
Ressler, J. (2022). Workplace anonymity. Buffalo L. Rev., 70, 1495–1560.
Romero, F. J. (2025, 3 October). California gives Uber, Lyft drivers collective bargaining rights. KQED. https://www.kqed.org/news/12057798/california-gives-uber-lyft-drivers-collective-bargaining-rights
Romero, P., & Whittaker, J. (2023). A brief examination of union membership data. Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47596
Rua, G., & Tito, M. (2024). Tapping the brakes: The effect of the 2023 United Auto Workers strike on economic activity. US Federal Reserve (Fed Notes). https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/tapping-the-brakes-the-effect-of-the-2023-united-auto-workers-strike-on-economic-activity-20240416.html
Smith, P., & Crain, M. (2025). Woke-washing at work. Wash. U. L.Rev., 102, 1509–1581.
Stabbert, Jr., G., & Ivy, K. (2025). Focus on employment law. Beyond politics: Achieving civility in the workplace. AZ Attorney, 61, 58–61.
Stein, B. (2022). Consumer corner I. A reversal of fortunes: The drop in consumer filings is running out of road. American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 41(1), 40–76.
Su, R., O’Rourke, A., & Binder, G. (2022). Defunding police agencies. Emory L. J., 71, 1197–1271.
Summers, C. (2003). Public sector bargaining: A different animal. U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L., 5, 441–452.
Szymanski, C. (2021). The idea of the general clause in American labor law. Bialystok Legal Studies, 26(2), 11–49.
Szymanski, C. (2022). Organized labor and the tech giants. Giornale di diritto del lavoro e di relazioni industriali, 173, 69–108.
Tippett, E. (2018). The legal implications of the MeToo movement. Minn. L. Rev., 103, 230, 251–252.
United States Congress. (1932). Norris–LaGuardia Act, 29 US C.
United States Congress. (1935). National Labor Relations Act, 29 US C., as amended.
United States Congress. (1947). National Labor Relations Act, 29 US C., as amended.
United States Congress. (1974). National Labor Relations Act, 29 US C., as amended.
UPI. (1984, 16 August). AFL-CIO president Lane Kirkland says federal labor laws do more harm than good for workers. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/08/16/AFL-CIO-President-Lane-Kirkland-says-federal-labor-laws-do/5286461476800/
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024, 21 February). Annual work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers, 1947 – present. https://www.bls.gov/web/wkstp/annual-listing.htm
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024, 21 February). News release: Major work stoppages.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/wkstp.pdf
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025, 28 January). Union membership (annual) news release. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.htm
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025, 20 February). Major work stoppages.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/wkstp_02202025.htm
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025, 6 March). 31 major work stoppages began in 2024. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2025/31-major-work-stoppages-began-in-2024.htm
Vereckey, B. (2024, 17 July). Federal spending was responsible for the 2022 spike in inflation, research shows. MIT Management Sloan School. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/federal-spending-was-responsible-2022-spike-inflation-research-shows
Wiessner, D. (2025, 28 January). Trump paralyzes US labor board by firing Democratic member. Reuters.
Wilkinson, A. (2023, 2 May). The looming threat of AI to Hollywood, and why it should matter to you. Vox. https://www.vox.com/culture/23700519/writers-strike-ai-2023-wga
Wiseman, P. (2024, 21 May). Trump or Biden? Either way, US seems poised to preserve heavy tariffs on imports. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/trump-biden-trade-tariffs-china-inflation-1c17b1d223080b7a594326905380845a
