Balancing Interests in Trade Secrets Protection under EU Law: A Human Rights and Freedoms Perspective
Keywords:
Directive 2016/943, employer–employee interests, employment relationships, human rights balancing, trade secretsAbstract
This article examines the challenges in balancing employers’ and employees’ conflicting interests regarding trade secrets protection under EU Directive 2016/943. It analyses provisions of the Directive that may be relevant for such a balancing exercise and highlights the challenges associated with their application, particularly the problem of subjectivity. The study identifies key human rights and freedoms relevant in this context, including the right to privacy, freedom to conduct a business and freedom to choose an occupation. It explores EU Member States’ obligations to consider these rights when protecting trade secrets. The article proposes using a perspective on human rights and freedoms to facilitate the balancing exercise. To minimize subjectivity, it suggests the application of a structured balancing test for human rights conflicts as proposed by Smet. The article argues that this approach could support a judicious balance between employees’ and employers’ competing interests in cases of trade secrets protection.
References
Alexy, R. (2003). Constitutional rights, balancing, and rationality. Ratio Juris, 16(2), 131–140.
Alexy, R. (2014). Constitutional rights and proportionality. Revus, 22, 51–65. Court of Justice of the European Union. (2001). Opinion of Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer in Ismeri Europa Srl v. Court of Auditors, C-315/99 P. ECLI:EU:C:2001:432.
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2013). Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón in Mark Alemo-Herron and Others v. Parkwood Leisure Ltd, C-426/11. ECLI:EU:C:2013:82.
Court of Justice of the European Union. (2017). Opinion of Advocate General Michal Bobek in Werner Fries v. Lufthansa CityLine GmbH, C-190/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:225.
Domeij, B. (2020). The Trade Secret Directive and employees. In J. Schovsbo, T. Minssen, & T. Riis (Eds.), The harmonization and protection of trade secrets in the EU (pp. 149–170). Edward Elgar Publishing.
European Commission. (2012). Public consultation on the protection against misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential business information: Summary of responses. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/consultations/public-consultation-protection-against-misappropriation-trade-secrets-and-confidential-business_en
European Commission. (2013). Study on trade secrets and confidential business information in the internal market: Final study. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/14838/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf
European Court of Human Rights. (1950, 4 November). European convention on human rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2016, June 8). Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Undisclosed Know-How and Business Information (Trade Secrets) against Their Unlawful Acquisition, Use and Disclosure
(O. J. L 157, 15.6.2016, 1–18).
European Union. (2007). Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights. (2007/C 303/02) (O. J. C 303, 14.12.2007, 17–35).
European Union. (2012). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (O. J. C 326, 26.10.2012, 391–407).
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2015). Freedom to conduct a business: Exploring the dimensions of a fundamental right. Publications Office of the European Union.
García Coso, E. (2024). Article 15. In A. Silveira, L. Araújo Coelho, M.I. Costa, T. S. Cabral (Eds.), The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A commentary (pp. 167–175). JusGov/UMinho Law School.
Groussot, X., Petursson, G. T., & Pierce, J. (2014). Weak right, strong court: The freedom to conduct business and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights [Legal Research Paper Series no. 01/2014]. Lund University. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfmabstract_id=2428181
Hogan, H. (2023). The origins and development of Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. European Law Open, 2(3), 753–783.
Hrdy, C. A. (2019). The general knowledge, skill, and experience paradox. Boston College Law Review, 60, 2423–2495.
Irgens-Jensen, H. (2023). Departing employees, confidentiality clauses and European trade secret protection. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54, 495–526.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 19 November 1998 on the case of Gunnar Nilsson, Per Olov Hagelgren, Solweig Arrborn, C 162/97, ECLI:EU:C:1998:554.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 11 July 2002 on the case of Mary Carpenter and Secretary of State for the Home Department, C 60/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:434.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16 February 2012 on the case of Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v. Netlog, N. V., C 360/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:85.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 29 March 2012 on the case of Interseroh Scrap and Metals Trading GmbH v. Sonderabfall-Management-Gesellschaft Rheinland-Pfalz mbH (SAM), C 1/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:194.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) of 9 September 2004 on the case of Kingdom of Spain (C-184/02) and Republic of Finland (C-223/02) v. European Parliament and Council of the European Union, joined cases C 184/02 and C 223/02, European Court Reports 2004 I–07789, ECLI:EU:C:2004:497.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 8 October 1986 on the case of Staatsanwaltschaft Freiburg v. Franz Keller, C 234/85, European Court Reports 1986–02897, ECLI:EU:C:1986:377.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 10 July 1991 on the case of Jean Neu and Others v. Secrétaire d’Etat à l’Agriculture et à la Viticulture, joined cases C 90/90 and C 91/90, European Court Reports 1991 I–03617, ECLI:EU:C:1991:303.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 14 February 2008 on the case of Varec SA v. Belgian State, C 450/06, European Court Reports 2008 I–00581, ECLI:EU:C:2008:91.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 24 November 2011 on the case of Scarlet Extended SA v. Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM), C 70/10, ECLI:EU:C:2011:771.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 6 September 2012 on the case of Deutsches Weintor eG v. Land Rheinland-Pfalz, C 544/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:526.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 on the case of Mark Alemo-Herron and Others v. Parkwood Leisure Ltd, C 426/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:521.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 24 June 1986 on the case of AKZO Chemie BV and AKZO Chemie UK Ltd v. Commission of the European Communities, C 53/85, European Court Reports 1986–01965.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 19 May 1994 on the case of Samenwerkende Elektriciteits-Produktiebedrijven (SEP) NV v. Commission of the European Communities, C 36/92 P, European Court Reports 1994 I–01911, ECLI:EU:C:1994:205.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 24 November 2005 on the case of Deutsches Milch-Kontor GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas, C 136/04, European Court Reports 2005 I–10095, ECLI:EU:C:2005:716.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Sixth Chamber) of 25 November 1998 on the case of Giuseppe Manfredi v. Regione Puglia, C 308/97, European Court Reports 1998 I–07685, ECLI:EU:C:1998:566.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 1999 on the case of Kingdom of Spain v. Commission of the European Communities, C 240/97, European Court Reports 1999 I–06571, ECLI:EU:C:1999:479.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 29 January 2008 on the case of Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v. Telefónica de España, S. A. U., C 275/06, European Court Reports 2008 I–00271, ECLI:EU:C:2008:54.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 22 January 2013 on the case of Sky Österreich GmbH v. Österreichischer Rundfunk, C 283/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:28.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 May 1974 on the case of J. Nold, Kohlen – und Baustoffgroßhandlung v. Commission of the European Communities, C 4–73, European Court Reports 1974–00491, ECLI:EU:C:1974:51.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 16 January 1979 on the case of Sukkerfabriken Nykøbing Limiteret v. Ministry of Agriculture, C 151/78, European Court Reports 1979–00001, ECLI:EU:C:1979:4.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 27 September 1979 on the case of SpA Eridania-Zuccherifici nazionali and SpA Società Italiana per l’Industria degli Zuccheri v. Minister of Agriculture and Forestry, Minister for Industry, Trade and Craft Trades, and SpA Zuccherifici Meridionali, C 230/78, European Court Reports 1979–02749, ECLI:EU:C:1979:216.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 9 October 1979 on the case of Airey v. Ireland, application no. 6289/73.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 16 December 1992 on the case of Niemietz v. Germany, application no. 13710/88.
Judgment of European Court of Human Rights of 27 March 1996 on the case of Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, application no. 17488/90.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 June 1997 on the case of Halford v. United Kingdom, application no. 20605/92.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 16 April 2002 on the case of Société Colas Est and Others v. France, application no. 37971/97.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 3 April 2007 on the case of Copland v. United Kingdom, application no. 62617/00.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 23 September 2010 on the case of Obst v. Germany, application no. 425/03.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 23 September 2010 on the case of Schüth v. Germany, application no. 1620/03.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 September 2017 on the case of Bărbulescu v. Romania, application no. 61496/08.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 November 2017 on the case of Antović and Mirković v. Montenegro, application no. 70838/13.
Judgment of High Court of Chancery of 27 March 1817 on the case of Newbery v. James 35 English Reports 1011.
Judgment of High Court of Chancery of 10, 12 November 1869 on the case of Leather Cloth Co v. Lorsont 9 L. R. Eq. 345, 354.
Kolasa, M. (2018). Trade secrets and employee mobility: In search of an equilibrium. Cambridge University Press.
Korycińska-Rządca, P. (2024). Trade secrets in the digital age: How do the measures provided for in EU law face the challenges of protecting an employer’s trade secrets against unauthorised acquisition, use and disclosure by its employees? Bialystok Legal Studies, 29(2), 163–176.
Leijten, I. (2018). Core socio-economic rights and the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
Menell, P. S., Lemley, M. A., Merges, R. P., & Balganesh, S. (2023). Intellectual property in the new technological age: 2023. Clause 8 Publishing: Vol. 1. Perspectives, trade secrets & patents. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4507044
O’Connor, N. (2024). Business freedoms and fundamental rights in European Union law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191982132.003.0006
Oliver, P. (2009). The protection of privacy in the economic sphere before the European Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review, 46. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2394179
Oliver, P. (2013). What purpose does Article 16 of the Charter serve? In U. Bernitz, X. Groussot, & F. Schulyok (Eds.), General principles of EU law and European private law. Wolters Kluwer. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2567786
Schiller, A. (1930). Trade secrets and the Roman law: The actio servi corrupti. Columbia Law Review, 30, 837–845.
Smet, S. (2017a). Resolving conflicts between human rights: The judge’s dilemma, Routledge. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3172820
Smet, S. (2017b). Conflicts between human rights and the ECtHR: Towards a structured balancing test. In S. Smet & E. Brems (Eds.), When human rights clash at the European Court of Human Rights: Conflict or harmony? (pp. 38–57). Oxford University Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1989). Invention and ritual: Notes on the interrelation of magic and intellectual property in preliterate societies. Columbia Law Review, 89, 1264–1294.
Sunder, M. (2013). Trade secret and human freedom. In S. Balganesh (Ed.), Intellectual property and the common law (pp. 334–352). Cambridge University Press.
Watson, A. (1996). Trade secrets and Roman law: The myth exploded. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, 11, 19–33.
Wiśniewski, A. (2023). The protection of entrepreneurs and the European Convention on Human Rights. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 28(4), 12–29.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, annex 1C. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_04b_e.htm
