Commercial Registers as Administrative Databases: Balancing Public Accessibility and Privacy
Abstrakt
Countries develop various administrative databases in order to better perform governmental functions or to specifically influence certain civil relations or the behaviour of individuals. One particular and distinctive type of database containing personal data is commercial registers in Europe, which have a specific characteristic: they are accessible to the public and the data published has a binding nature. At the same time, this public accessibility of the personal data in commercial registers, especially with the increasing availability of digital technologies and their impact on society, can create a conflict with the privacy of the individuals included in these databases. This article first examines commercial registers as a form of public digitalisation, and then how the European Court of Justice, in its case law, balances the public accessibility which is an integral part of commercial registers with the right to privacy and data protection. In conclusion, the article generalises the lessons from the European Court of Justice case law and from legal scholarship that can be applied to preserve privacy, while the public accessibility of commercial registers is respected.Bibliografia
Ayata, Z. (2024). European Union contracts in digital environments. In D.R. Troitiño (Ed.), E-governance in the European Union: Strategies, tools, and implementation (pp. 173–185). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Blajer, P. (2023). On the principle of public faith of land registers in a comparative context. European Property Law Journal, 12 (2–3), 79–125. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2023–0005.
Caravà, E. (2017). Personal data kept in companies registers: The denial of the ‘right to be forgotten’. European Data Protection Law Review, 3(1), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/2/26
Cindori, S. (2023). Beneficial ownership – Demand for transparency, threat to privacy. Review of European and Comparative Law, 55(4), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.16352
Costa, M. I. (2023). The legal concept of discrimination by association: Where does it fit into the digital era? UNIO–EU Law Journal, 9(1), 16–28.
de la Guardia, R. M. (2005). La política europea de España después de su integración en las Comunidades. Cuadernos europeos de Deusto, 32, 61–84.
European Parliament and Council. (2016, 27 April). On the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive
95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (O. J. L 119, 04.05.2016).
European Parliament and Council. (2017, 14 June). Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council Relating to Certain Aspects of Company Law (Codification) (O. J. L 169, 30.06.2017).
European Union. (2007, 12 December). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (O. J. C 326, 26.10.2012).
Ferretti, F. (2022). A single European data space and data act for the digital single market: On datafication and the viability of a PSD2-like access regime for the platform economy. European Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 173–218s.
Galetta, D.U., Hofmann, H. C. H., Lottini, M., Marsch, N., Schneider, J. P., Tidghi, M. (2014). Book VI – Administrative Information Management. In H. Hofmann, J. P. Schneider, & J. Ziller (Eds.). Re-NEUAL model rules on EU administrative procedure (pp. 232–318). ReNEUAL research network on EU administrative law. https://hdl.handle.net/10993/19862
Garnowski, K. (2022). The principle of reliability of business trading in the context of personal changes in partnerships. Review of European and Comparative Law 51(4), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.14603
Gonet, W., & Wolska, H. (2019). Performing legal transactions based on entries in public registers: Selected issues. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, 36(1), 85–101. https://doi. org/10.33119/JMFS.2019.36.6
Hamuľák, O. (2016). National sovereignty in the European Union: View from the Czech perspective. Springer.
Heidemann, M. (2019). Commercial registers and transparency. Amicus Curiae, 112(2017), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2017i112.5042
Jabłoński, M. (2025). The right to privacy and the obligation to transfer and authenticate personal data through the internet: Conflicting issues. Bialystok Legal Studies, 30(4), 161–175. https://doi.
org/10.15290/bsp.2025.30.04.10
Jekabsone, I. (2023). Selected legal issues in online adult education: Compliance of online learning and teaching process with GDPR. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 13(2), 46–62. https://doi.
org/10.2478/bjes-2023–0015
Judgment of the CJEU of 9 March 2017 on the case of Manni, C-398/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:197.
Judgment of the CJEU of 22 November 2022 on the case of Luxembourg Business Registers, joined cases C‑37/20 and C‑601/20, ECLI:EU:C:2022:912.
Judgment of the CJEU of 4 October 2024 on the case of Agentsia po vpisvaniyata, C-200/23, ECLI:EU:C:2024:827.
Judgment of the CJEU of 3 April 2025 on the case of Ministerstvo zdravotnictví, C-710/23, ECLI:EU:C:2025:231.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Latvia of 31 January 2019 in case no. SKA 148/2019 (A420322015).
Lisičar, H., & Jurić, M. (2024). How much transparency is too much? Open access to public registers in Croatia and personal data protection. SEE Law Journal, 13(1), 12–31.
Kerikmäe, T., Troitiño, D. R., & Shumilo, O. (2019). An idol or an ideal? A case study of Estonian e-governance: Public perceptions, myths and misbeliefs. Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 7(1), 71–80.
Maatsch, A. (2024). Parliamentary adjustment during a crisis: Interplay of digitalization and domestic context factors. Internet of Things, 27, 101316.
Mazur, V., & Ramiro Troitiño, D. (2024). The members of the EU and e-governance, analysis, and institutional support. In D.R. Troitiño (Ed.), E-Governance in the European Union: Strategies, tools, and implementation (pp. 39–55). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Mokrá, L. (2023). Digitally sovereign individuals: The right to disconnect as a new challenge for European legislation in the context of building the EU digital market. In D. R. Troitiño, T. Kerikmäe, O. Hamuľák (Eds.), Digital development of the European Union: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 189–197). Springer International Publishing.
Motzfeldt, H. M., & Næsborg-Andersen, A. (2018). Developing administrative law into handling the challenges of digital government in Denmark. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 16(2), 136–146.
Mudrecki, A. (2021). The contemporary significance of the principle of proportionality in tax law. Bialystok Legal Studies, 26(4), 37–51, https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.04.03
Outeda, C. C. (2024). The EU’s AI Act: A framework for collaborative governance. Internet of Things, 27 (01291).
Papacharissi, Z., & Gibson, P. L. (2011). Fifteen minutes of privacy: Privacy, sociality, and publicity on social network sites. In S. Trepte, L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 75–89). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Potaičuks, A. (2024). Data protection under review of constitutional court: Administrative databases directly accessible to public authorities. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 14(2), 73–87. https://
doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2024–0017
Potaičuks, A., & Tamužs, K. (2025). Open court principle and respecting privacy: Granting anonymity and restricting access to case files in constitutional court review procedure. International Journal
for Court Administration, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.593
Purtova, N. (2018). The law of everything: Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law. Law, Innovation and Technology, 10(1), 40–81. https://doi:10.1080/17579961.2018.1452176
Reichel, J., & Chamberlain, J. (2021). Public registries as tools for realising the Swedish welfare state: Can the state still be trusted? Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 6(2), 35–
52. https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.4
Rek, M. (2024). E-democracy in the EU. In D.R. Troitiño (Ed.), E-governance in the European Union: Strategies, tools, and implementation (pp. 103–115). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Škorić, S. (2020). The application of digital technology in business registration. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 37, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2004001S
Štemberger Brizani, K. (2024). Administrative contract in administrative matters: Slovenian law in comparative perspective. Bratislava Law Review, 8(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.717
Šulmane, D. (2025). Defense concept through the legislature – Protecting values for the sustainability of society. Environment Technology Resources: Proceedings of the 16th International Scientific and
Practical Conference, 5, 303–309. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2025vol5.8511
Szostek, S., Malarewicz-Jakubów, A., & Castellani, M. (2025). Koncepcja i podstawy prawne dla nowego ujęcia rejestru – Rejestr 3.0. Bialystok Legal Studies, 30(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.15290/ bsp.2025.30.03.12
Timan, T., & Mann, Z. (2021). Data protection in the era of artificial intelligence: Trends, existing solutions and recommendations for privacy-preserving technologies. In E. Curry, A. Metzger, S. Zillner, J. C. Pazzaglia, A. García Robles (Eds.), The elements of big data value: Foundations of the research and innovation ecosystem (pp. 153–175). Springer International Publishing.
Troitiño, D. R. (2022). The European Union facing the 21st century: The digital revolution. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 12(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022–0003
Troitiño, D. R., Mazur, V., & Kerikmäe, T. (2024). E-governance and integration in the European Union. Internet of Things, 27(1), 101321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101321
van der Sloot, B. (2015). Do privacy and data protection rules apply to legal persons and should they? A proposal for a two-tiered system. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(1), 26–45. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.clsr.2014.11.002
Vardanyan, L., Kocharyan, H., Hamulák, O., Mesarčík, M., Kerikmäe, T., & Kookmaa, T. (2023). The unwanted paradoxes of the right to be forgotten. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 17(1), 87–109.
Wegner, J. (2025). The constitutionalization of the internet and the right to non-use. Bialystok Legal Studies, 30(4), 28. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2025.30.04.02
